Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Risch v. Royal Oak Police Dep't, No. 08-1883

By FindLaw Staff on September 23, 2009 3:22 PM

In plaintiff's gender discrimination action under Title VII against the police department, summary judgment for defendants is reversed and remanded as plaintiff, a patrol officer and a seventeen-year veteran with the department, had arguably superior qualification than the two successful applicants who received the promotions as detectives and produced other probative evidence of gender discrimination.  

Read Risch v. Royal Oak Police Dep't, No. 08-1883

Appellate Information

Argued: August 4, 2009

Decided and Filed: September 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Moore

Counsel

For Appellant:  Richard I. Lippitt, Law Office of Richard I. Lippitt, PC of Milford, Michigan

For Appellee:  Karen M. Daley, Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, PLC, of Livonia, Michigan

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options