Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Quinney, No. 07-4055

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on October 01, 2009 11:54 AM

In a conviction for manufacturing and passing counterfeit currency, district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress key evidence used against him is reversed and remanded where: 1) the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply to warrantless searches where a warrant could have been obtained based on probable cause; and 2) the case is remanded to evaluate the statements made by defendant to the agents, based on the mistaken belief that the printer was properly admissible evidence, to evaluate whether they should also be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree.   

Read US v. Quinney, No. 07-4055

Appellate Information

Argued: July 31, 2009

Decided and Filed: October 1, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Gilman

Counsel

For Appellant:  Jeffrey Paul Nunnari, Toledo, Ohio

For Appellee:  David O. Bauer, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, Ohio

Find a Lawyer

More Options