Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

In re: Nowak, No. 08-3690

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 13, 2009 1:44 PM

In Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) denial of plaintiff-creditor's motion to allow an informal proof of claim based on its prior filings as a putative secured creditor is affirmed as the BAP did not abuse its discretion in finding that: 1) plaintiff had ample notice of the likelihood that it would lose its status as a secured creditor, necessitating the filing of a proof of claim; 2) plaintiff's unexplained delay weighed against allowing plaintiff's informal proof of claim; and 3) the large dilution in the distribution to other creditors in this case was an appropriate consideration weighing against allowing plaintiff's claim. 


Read In re: Nowak, No. 08-3690

Appellate Information

Argued: October 13, 2009

Decided and Filed: November 13, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Gilman

Counsel

For Appellant:  David A. Freeburg, McFadden & Freeburg Co., LPA., Cleveland, Ohio

For Appellee: Lydia Evelyn Spragin, Akron, Ohio

Find a Lawyer

More Options