Take That New York!: Regional Firms in Middle Markets Outperform AmLaw 100
Firms that refused to follow the AmLaw 100 formula for growth also bucked the AmLaw 100 trend of declining revenue per lawyers according to the AmLaw 200 2009 report
As AmLaw 100 firms have watched their revenues go down the drain, the "Second Hundred" firms have been faring reasonably well. The report attributes this to the fact that the firms ignored the blueprint for success drafted by the top 100 firms in their heyday - "relentless focus on the most lucrative markets, practices, and clients" - and instead "held on to less-profitable practices; . . . worked with clients on
matters far removed from the Wall Street money machine; and . . .
contented themselves with fees that were a fraction of their East Coast
and national siblings."
What's perhaps most surprising is the success of regional firms that
didn't follow the conventional wisdom about trimming away all but the
most successful practice areas. Instead, these firms kept their focus
broad, remained client-oriented and thrived.
Conversely, some of the
Second Hundred's biggest underperformers were firms that concentrated
on a limited number of practice areas.
What all this seems to
suggest is that the Second Hundred firms, and by extension other regional
firms, have an excellent opportunity to build business with those
clients fleeing the AmLaw 100 firms.
The recession has created a chink
in the AmLaw 100's armor, but it won't last forever. Some of AmLaw's
contributing editors still believe that the trend towards specialization is
still the way to go.
For the time being, however, it looks like the Second Hundred will be fine casting a wide net.See Also:
The AmLaw 200 2009: Where the Work Was (AmLaw Daily
The AmLaw 200 2009 (American Lawyer
Am Law 200 Pwns Am Law 100 (Above the Law
Report Confirms It: 2009 Will Most Likely Be As Bad As 2008 (FindLaw's Strategist
2009 Am Law 100: The Party's Over (FindLaw's Strategist