Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l. Corp., No. 08-1198

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on April 27, 2010 3:32 PM

Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l. Corp., No. 08-1198, involved an antitrust class action in which the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court's order vacating an arbitration panel's order allowing for class arbitration of the dispute.

As the court wrote:  "We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose arbitration clauses are "silent" on that issue is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. §1 et seq."

The Supreme Court reversed, holding that imposing class arbitration on parties who had not agreed to authorize class arbitration was inconsistent with the Federal Arbitration Act, and the arbitration panel imposed class arbitration despite the parties' stipulation that they had reached "no agreement" on that issue.

Related Resources

Find a Lawyer

More Options