Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's drug conviction is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude that defendant provided cocaine for drug transactions; and 2) certain challenged statements by a prosecution witness were not hearsay because they did not depend on the witness's truthfulness, memory, or perception.
Filed August 12, 2009
Opinion by Judge Hartz
James A. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, KS