Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Harman v. Pollock, No. 08-4068

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 18, 2009 3:26 PM

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging that defendant-officers unlawfully detained plaintiffs and searched their home, summary judgment for defendants on qualified immunity grounds is affirmed where defendants' discovery of marijuana ultimately gave them reason to detain plaintiffs, to seize the marijuana, and to perform two more searches of plaintiffs' apartment.

Read Harman v. Pollock, No. 08-4068

Appellate Information

Filed November 18, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Henry

Counsel

For Appellants:

Robert B. Sykes, Alyson E. Carter, Scott R. Edgar, Robert B. Sykes & Associates, P.C., Salt Lake City, UT

For Appellees:

J. Clifford Petersen and Mark L. Shurtleff, Utah Attorney General's Office, Salt Lake City, UT

Find a Lawyer

More Options