Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Albert Inv. Co., No. 08-6267

By FindLaw Staff on November 11, 2009 11:00 AM

In an appeal from the district court's denial of appellant's motion to intervene in an action brought by the U.S. under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the order is reversed where the proposed consent decree would eliminate appellant's contribution right as to the settling defendants, and thus appellant had an interest in the outcome of the action.

Read US v. Albert Inv. Co., No. 08-6267

Appellate Information

Filed November 10, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Kelly

Counsel

For Appellant:

William George, Debra Tsuchiyama Baker and Michael Connelly, Baker & Wotring, L.L.P., Houston, TX

For Appellees:

Gerald Hilsher, Stephen L. Jantzen, McAfee & Taft, P.C., Tulsa, OK

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options