Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Caldwell, No. 08-6143

By FindLaw Staff on December 30, 2009 9:58 AM

Defendant's drug conspiracy conviction is affirmed where: 1) sharing a common supplier, without more, did not demonstrate that two drug dealers were acting together for their shared mutual benefit; and 2) the mere introduction of a common supplier, made by one drug dealer to another, was not sufficient to create a single conspiracy among all the dealers, but these errors did not affect defendant's substantial rights.  However, defendant's sentence is vacated where the jury's determination of drug quantity was clearly erroneous because it was based on an unsupported tripartite conspiracy.

Read US v. Caldwell, No. 08-6143

Appellate Information

Filed December 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Lucero

Counsel

For Appellant:

John T. Carlson and Raymond P. Moore, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Sanford C. Coats, John C. Richter, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Oklahoma City, OK

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options