Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Sayad, No. 08-1366

By FindLaw Staff on December 22, 2009 10:14 PM

In the government's appeal of defendant's sentence for interstate travel in aid of racketeering, the sentence is affirmed where: 1) the district court committed no procedural error in mentioning defendant's Iranian-Christian status; and 2) the record supported the weight the district court attached to certain 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors in varying downward from the applicable Guidelines sentence.

Read US v. Sayad, No. 08-1366

Appellate Information

Filed December 22, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Murphy

Counsel

For Appellant:

Michael C. Johnson, David M. Gaouette, Assistant United States Attorneys, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Howard A. Pincus, Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defenders, Denver, CO

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options