Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. US, No. 08-7102

By FindLaw Staff on January 06, 2010 3:38 PM

In a Federal Tort Claims Act action by a railroad against the government based on the derailment of a train, judgment for plaintiff is reversed where: 1) the Tucker Act deprived the district court of jurisdiction over plaintiff's negligent breach of contract claim because it was a contract claim under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims; and 2) plaintiff's negligent inspection and maintenance claim was barred by the exculpatory clause of the parties' agreement, which did not violate Oklahoma public policy.

Read Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. US, No. 08-7102

Appellate Information

Filed January 5, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hartz

Counsel

For Appellant:

Sarang V. Damle, Michael F. Hertz, Sheldon J. Sperling, Thomas M. Bondy, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

George R. Mullican, Robert D. Hart and Christopher D. Wolek, Gibbs Armstrong Borochoff Mullican & Hart, P.C., Tulsa, OK
Plaintiff - Appellee.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options