Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Lewis, No. 08-1170

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on February 12, 2010 3:14 PM

Defendants' convictions and sentences for securities and wire fraud are affirmed in part where: 1) there was sufficient evidence of guilt on a challenged wire fraud count even though the victim did not testify; 2) defendant failed to overcome the presumption of reasonableness of his within-guidelines 330-year sentence; 3) neither defendant pointed to the admission at trial of any inadmissible hearsay; 4) an indictment need not charge aiding and abetting in addition to the substantive offense; and 5) defendant was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he did not allege that an affiant in support of a search warrant lied in the affidavit. However, one defendant's conviction is reversed in part where the government conceded that it had no evidence that defendant knew that his agent's sales pitch was fraudulent, and it failed to point to any evidence supporting the theory that defendant caused the agent to make any of her false statements.

Read US v. Lewis, No. 08-1170

Appellate Information

Opinion by Judge Hartz


For Appellant:

Jonathan S. Willett, Denver, CO

For Appellees:

Matthew T. Kirsch and James C. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorneys, Denver, CO

Find a Lawyer

More Options