Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Waterman, No. 08-2543

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on June 24, 2009 1:38 PM

District court order suppressing evidence against defendant is reversed where defendant was not seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment under California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 627 (1991), as there was no application of physical force and no submission to the assertion of authority. 

Read US v. Waterman, No. 08-2543

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
Argued: March 24, 2009
Filed: June 24, 2009


Judges
Before RENDELL, AMBRO, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Shawn A. Weede, Office of United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE.

For Defendant: Brian Crockett, Office of Federal Public Defender, Wilmington, DE.

Find a Lawyer

More Options