Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc., No. 09-2548

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 07, 2010 3:44 PM

In a suit for unlawful price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) against a food manufacturer and a food service management company, judgment in favor of plaintiff-food distributor is vacated with instruction for the district court to enter judgment as a matter of law for defendants as plaintiff cannot satisfy the competitive injury requirement of a prima facie case of price discrimination under section 2(a) of the RPA because the plaintiff and defendant were not competitors, and therefore, plaintiff cannot show it suffered competitive injury under RPA. 

Read Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc., No. 09-2548

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Opinion Filed January 7, 2010

Judges

Before: Smith, Nygaard, and Fisher, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Smith

Counsel:

For Appellant:  Jeffrey L. Kessler, Dewey & LeBoeuf

For Appellee:   Robert T. Englert, Glen D. Nager

Find a Lawyer

More Options