Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Marion v. TDI, Inc., No. 06-5173

By FindLaw Staff on January 04, 2010 1:35 PM

In an action brought by a receiver for a corporation through which a Ponzi scheme was run against various third-parties, denial of defendants' post-trial motion for judgment of law is vacated and remanded where, although the receiver sufficiently alleged an injury distinct to the corporation to get past the standing threshold, on the facts presented to the jury, neither key individual defendants can be liable to the plaintiff acting as the corporation's receiver. 

Read Marion v. TDI, Inc., No. 06-5173

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Opinion Filed January 4, 2010

Judges

Before: Ambro, Weis, and Van Antwerpen, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Ambro

Counsel:

For Appellant:  Eugen E. Stearns, Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson; Alan K. Cotler, Reed Smith; Laurence A. Mester, Grossman Law Firm

For Appellee:   David D. Langfitt, John H. Lewis, Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options